Artificial intelligence is transforming how societies are governed and how power is exercised across borders. Yet national and international institutions continue to struggle with building effective frameworks for accountability, cooperation, and ethical use. In the context of growing geopolitical rivalry and an accelerating AI arms race, our AI Governance programme explores how emerging technologies can be governed to reinforce democracy, security, and sustainable development.
The programme links research with policy practice, examining the implications of AI for regulation, global security, and equity. It convenes experts and practitioners to identify governance gaps, assess risks, and advance solutions that align technological innovation with the public good. We publish independent research, promote informed dialogue, and train the next generation of policymakers through initiatives such as the AI Global Governance Summer School, working to build a more coherent and responsible global approach to the governance of artificial intelligence.
Publications
What developments in AI tell us about the future of governance models
Misinformation and disinformation, amplified by AI, pose major challenges for democracy. As AI increases information production, it can enhance collective intelligence but also contribute to polarization. To combat this, institutions must regain trust through transparency and openness, adapting to new models of governance.
How Ukraine uses AI to fight Russian information operations
Ukraine has leveraged AI in its information war against Russia, using tools like Osavul and Mantis Analytics to detect and counter disinformation quickly. AI-supported open-source intelligence (OSINT) helps debunk Russian claims and document war crimes. However, controversial uses, like facial recognition software and AI-generated images, raise ethical concerns.
Got trust? Global governance of emerging technologies
Emerging technologies, particularly AI and quantum tech, present both opportunities and risks. The U.S. and NATO have emphasized balancing innovation with regulation to maintain competitiveness and address societal challenges. However, these technologies also create vulnerabilities, such as AI-driven disinformation, requiring new frameworks for global cooperation and governance.
Last minute national objections to the EU’s AI Act are a mistake. Here’s why
The EU's AI Act faced delays after France and Germany opposed regulating general-purpose AI models like GPT-4, fearing overregulation could harm Europe's AI competitiveness. Despite challenges, the EU must prioritize digital rights and proactive regulation to address AI risks, aiming for a balance between innovation and accountability.
Experts
